An Approach for Argumentation-based Reasoning Using Defeasible Logic in Multi-Agent Programming Languages

نویسندگان

  • Alison R. Panisson
  • Felipe Meneguzzi
  • Renata Vieira
  • Rafael H. Bordini
چکیده

Argumentation systems are intimately related to nonmonotonic reasoning, of which defeasible reasoning is one widely-known approach. For example, the literature points out defeasible logic (a particular formalisation of defeasible reasoning) as a practical platform upon which to develop an argumentation system. In this paper, we develop an approach to endow AgentSpeak agents with argumentative capabilities using defeasible reasoning, aiming in future work the development of multi-agent applications where agents interact through argumentationbased dialogues. We demonstrate the viability of our approach through an implementation in the Jason platform.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Realizing Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems Using Defeasible Logic Programming

We describe a working multi-agent architecture based on Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) by Garcı́a and Simari where agents are engaged in an argumentation to reach a common conclusion. Due to the distributed approach personalities and opinions of the individual agents give rise to arguments and counterarguments concerning a particular query. We establish a sound theoretical framework of a sp...

متن کامل

Defeasible argumentation for multi-agent planning in ambient intelligence applications

This contribution presents a practical extension of a theoretical model for multi-agent planning based upon DeLP, an argumentation-based defeasible logic. Our framework, named DeLP-MAPOP, is implemented on a platform for open multi-agent systems and has been experimentally tested, among others, in applications of ambient intelligence in the field of health-care. DeLP-MAPOP is based on a multi-a...

متن کامل

Defeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture

In this work, an agent architecture that combines defeasible argumentation and the BDI model is described. Argumentation will be used as a mechanism for reasoning about beliefs, for filtering desires considering the agent’s current environment, and for selecting proper intentions. The approach allows to define different types of agents and this will affect the way in which desires are filtered ...

متن کامل

A first approach to argument-based recommender systems based on defeasible logic programming

Recommender systems have evolved in the last years as specialized tools to assist users in a plethora of computermediated tasks by providing guidelines or hints. Most recommender systems are aimed at facilitating access to relevant items, a situation particularly common when performing web-based tasks. At the same time, defeasible argumentation has evolved as a successful approach in AI to mode...

متن کامل

Defeasible Reasoning and Partial Order Planning

Argumentation-based formalisms provide a way of considering the defeasible nature of reasoning with partial and often erroneous knowledge in a given environment. This problem affects every aspect of a planning process. We will present an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans starting from a previously introduced formalism. In such a formalism, agents repre...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014